Balance of Power

One of the things Thomas Piketty was rather undeservedly praised for last year, in reviews of Capital in the 21st Century, was his use of literary references like Jane Austen and Honoré de Balzac, to show the effects on ordinary life and culture of the greater inequality of 19th Century Europe. As Slate put it in a relatively critical response:

Novels by Balzac and Jane Austen matter for Piketty because they dramatize the immobility of a 19th-century world where inequality guaranteed more inequality—a world our own century is beginning to resemble once again. Since returns on capital were reliable, especially for large fortunes, the best way to get ahead was to start out ahead; income from labor could never catch up. The stability of 19th-century wealth is felt not only in plots that center on inheritance, but also, Piketty adds, in the references that flesh out a fictional world. “Specific references to wealth and income were omnipresent in the literature of all countries before 1914,” he writes, because money was a stable social reference point.

Yes, inheritance was much more important in old books, and probably it was more important in ordinary people’s lives, than inheritance is for most people today. See, for example, this historian’s account of how elderly, not particularly wealthy Americans in the 19th Century used the promise of an inheritance to get young people to take care of them as they lost their physical and mental capacities– inheritance was important for reasons unrelated to inequality, as well.

Moreover, inheritance was different in different places. Not everywhere (or everywhen) was Elizabeth Bartlett hounding after Mr. Darcy for his 10,000 a year. One of the reasons that Tolstoy’s books feel so modern even today is that Russian upper class women could inherit: there wasn’t primogeniture, and the oldest male heir didn’t inherit the whole shebang. As a result, Tolstoy is full of pretty and not-so-pretty heiresses being pursued by handsome wastrels, and the relations between the sexes in general feel a bit more equal than they do in English novels of the same vintage, another example of how changes in relative income appears to make a difference.

One of my intellectual pet peeves is the way we tend to date all changes in male-female relations from how things appear to us in 1950s movies and TV shows, from Cindarella and Father Knows Best. But the 50s were at a historical extreme of male to female earnings ratios- go read some Chaucer if you want to see women telling men what they really think.  Edith Wharton’s upper crust New York Society seems pretty straightlaced, but I’ve read accounts of Old West towns in Wyoming before the railroads come where the few women who were there seemed to be having a grand and wild old time.

The past never was one thing.

 

2 thoughts on “Balance of Power

  1. “But the 50s were at a historical extreme of male to female earnings ratios”. Good to know — is there any academic literature on this?
    And by the way, I’m always a bit suspicious of references to fiction and movies to support ambitious statements about the structure of society. Societies are complicated, and the space of possible analogies is immense, so I tend to lower my confidence in someone’s propositions if they constantly use that sort of cherry-picked reference instead of more rigorous arguments.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I just wanted to share this. There is a term for the ability of those with something, to acquire more of it: the Matthew Effect. First used by Robert K. Merton, it refers to the book of Matthew (25:29) and the parable of the talents; “For to everyone who has, more shall be given, and he will have an abundance; but from the one who does not have, even what he does have shall be taken away.”

    I’m not so worried about inter-generational inequality, because the 2nd or 3rd generation tends to squander things. And regression to the mean when it comes to ability. Why worry so much about the leg up that the wealthy give their kids when coming from a poor but intact family gives a better start.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s